Object Oriented Software Engineering   View all facts   Glossary   Help
subject > requirement > non-functional requirement > allowance for maintainability and enhancement
Next non-functional requirementallowance for reusability    Upnon-functional requirement    Previous non-functional requirementthroughput   

allowance for maintainability and enhancement
subjectfact 
allowance for maintainability and enhancementdescribes changes that are anticipated for subsequent releases2001-08-30 14:54:30.0
is a subtopic of 4.5 - Types of Requirements2001-08-30 14:54:30.0
is a kind of non-functional requirement2001-08-30 14:54:30.0
non-functional requirementmust be verifiable by measuring various aspects of the system and seeing if the measurements conform with the requirement2001-08-30 14:56:41.0
restricts the freedom of software engineers as they make design decisions because it limits what resources can be used and sets bounds on aspects of the software's quality2001-08-30 14:56:41.0
requirementcan be gathered from various stakeholders, other software systems and any documentation that might be available2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
changes regularly2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
has part problem statement2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
indicates how the system is to behave2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
is expressed as a fact2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
is grouped with other requirements into a requirements document2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
is normally expressed in a natural language such as English (using present tense and active voice), sometimes supplemented by a formal mathematical language, and often by some form of diagram2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
may be given a unique number for traceability2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
may be shown as a diagram2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
must be agreed upon by all stakeholders2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
should be analysed if there is any doubt whether it is realistic2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
should be changed whenever the benefits of doing so outweigh the costs2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
should be cut if cost-benefit analysis shows that it will have minimum benefit but still cost a lot to develop2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
should be expressed using clear and consistent notation, using language that the customers can understand, and consistent with the other requirements2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
should have benefits that outweigh the costs of development2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
should help solve a customer's problem2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
should lead to a system of sufficient quality - one that is sufficiently usable, safe, efficient, reliable and maintainable2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
should not indicate how it will be implemented in order to give the designer as much freedom as possible to make decisions2001-08-30 14:57:17.0
should not over-constrain the design of the system2001-08-30 14:57:17.0

Next non-functional requirementallowance for reusability    Upnon-functional requirement    Previous non-functional requirementthroughput